General

Welcome to MyGet’s UserVoice forum! We encourage you to leave some feedback about missing features, stuff you wish for us to include in MyGet, …

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Support PHP Composer

    Currently https://packagist.org/ is the main Composer repository. It aggregates public PHP packages installable with Composer.

    2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      1 comment  ·  Admin →
    • Option to favourite/follow a feed

      I want to be able to login to myget and get a list of feeds i follow or favourite so if I need to setup my dev machine I have the public feeds ready, i dont have to search for them.

      2 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      • Build services support for client side building.

        It would be nice to be able to do client side building with the build services that would allow for grunt/gulp, npm/bower restores along with the traditional nuget restores. The output would be a folder of static artifacts and could also include .NET dll's. To expand this further ASP.NET 5 (vNext) comes with a KPM pack command. It would also be nice to allow for us to create nuget packages that are created from KPM pack commands.

        3 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)

          We’re currently awaiting a RC for vNext so we can run builds of this type. Ideally, would you like us to run kpm pack? Or just make available kpm so you can run a build.bat which does npm, grunt and kpm pack in the end? Trying to figure out the most enjoyable workflow that makes it both generic enough for 90% of builds to always succeed by convention.

        • Attribute adding of packages to a proxy feed to user who triggers the add, not the owner

          It appears that when someone adds a package to a proxied feed that I own, that it shows me as the person who added the package. Is it would be great if this was attributed to the actual user who originally caused the package to be added to the proxied feed.

          1 vote
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          • Don't display package retention trimming actions in activity feed

            Right now, if I set a package retention rule up for a feed, once I exceed the max # of packages for that feed, there is an activity shown in the activity feed that makes it look like the owner account actively deleted the package. This has confused people and leads them to asking me why I am deleting packages.

            Instead it would be nice if a system user was used and the act of a package being "pushed" out of the feed due to retention rules was not described in the same way as deleting a package manually.

            1 vote
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
            • Don't see your idea?

            General

            Feedback and Knowledge Base